Hello, world

  • I think too much and then I write about what I think.
  • Hello, world


First Book

  • First Book: Do You Remember the Magic of Your First Book?


On my shelves

Become a Fan


  • I post links to blogs I find interesting. I do not "swap links" and I do not post advertisements in any form. Please do not contact me about such services. Thank you.
  • This is my personal blog. The views expressed here are mine only and do not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer, the National Science Foundation, or any other funding source.
  • I am not affiliated with toponlineengineeringdegree.com, sponsors4blogs.com, blogosphere-branding.com, or any other spam-type site that uses my blog address as part of a link on their site. Please do not sign up for any services offered through these sites.

Comment Policy

  • Comments are moderated. Inappropriate comments may be edited for content while respecting their author's intentions, but more often will not be published. Spam comments, including "generic praise spam" will not be published.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Blog powered by Typepad

« The Final Stretch: Candidate's Day | Main | Are We There Yet? »

April 24, 2008


Some people argue that Smolin is a mediocre scientist, and that his frustration for not being able to give any relevant contributions to theoretical physics has led him to write that book. Someone who is particularly aggressive towards Smolin is LuboŇ° Motl ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lubo%C5%A1_Motl ), a very talented and highly opinionated Czech theoretical physicist who was at Harvard and is now outside institutionalized Science (guess why!). For an example of Lubos' attacks on Smolin, check this out:

Many people seem way too eager to criticize String Theory without knowing anything about it. I think Smolin's views may be too biased. There are many heavy-weight people doing work on String Theory: Ed Witten, Steven Weinberg, Leonard Susskind, Brian Greene, Lisa Randall, etc etc etc. This group is worth its weight in gold. Are they all crazy? I doubt it. String Theory is a work in progress, and I think it would be wise to give it time to mature. As usual, I am against over-generalizations, and I would argue that it's not whether String Theory is good or bad, but which work in String Theory is good or bad. Many extremely smart people have dedicated many years of their lives to String Theory, and I think it's unlikely that we're witnessing collective madness here.

For a good overview of String Theory, Brian Greene's TED talk is truly awesome! :-)

The comments to this entry are closed.